@NoodleFighter said:
@osan0 said:
Ah Capcom...whatchya doin? Their games sell loads on the PC. They generally have a lot of good will and a good reputation too. What is this action over exactly?
@mrbojangles25 said:
Once again draconian DRM measures prove to a.) do little to nothing to stop piracy, b.) inconvenience the legitimate consumer, to the point of sometimes making the product unplayable or impossible to enjoy, and c.) are done from a position little to no consideration, often to the point of hostility (as shown by their official response).
“The image of a product is tarnished when mods are released that violate public order and morals without permission,”Capcom developers said in a YouTube videoabout anti-cheat and anti-piracy measures for in-house development. “Mods can be mistaken for legitimate implementations and can cause bad publicity.”
Link
Holy shit, these people sound like out-of-touch, regressive politicians. "...Violate public order and morals"?!?! Are you kidding me!?
They make games that sexualize women, have boatloads of violence and guns and gore, and more. And they're trying to excuse this anti-consumer behavior by taking the moral high ground?!
Oi vey!
It isn't about piracy but mods. Capcom realized that a ton of people are using mods for skins. So to them mods are eating into their sales of skin outfits.
Are these mods of the skins they are selling? Identical?
If not, then no issue from where I am standing with modders creating content. If Capcom wants to make more money, they should offer more skins. Generally speaking, from both a quality and stability standpoint, content made in-house by the developer is better than mods; I think if people had the option, they would by official skins. If they are available.
Instead what we have here is Capcom saying "We don't want you using free mods to add content, so we are going to block your mods...but we aren't going to bother making more content, either".
I don't really follow the logic there to be honest and think it is an error on Capcom's part from both an ethical standpoint, and a business standpoint as well as they might have kicked the hornets nest. They were worried about optics and ethics and PR and now they've ruined all of that with this move that won't net them any goodwill or business or additional money from microtransactions.
The only exception of course would be if modders are ripping off official skins. In that case, I can understand a company wanting to defend themselves.
We see this not just with Capcom, but Nintendo and others as well. I feel like the developer-consumer bond and relationship should be mutually beneficial and appreciative; we give them business, we get a product, we continue to develop product past it's initial offering with mods which drives interest, which in turn drives future sales of additional games and extra content.
Moves like this interrupt that cycle and just sort of ruin it for everyone, consumer and creator and publisher alike.
Log in to comment