If this was a game I wanted to play, $70 would be fine. 15 hours for main campaign would take me a month or more to complete. I don't rush through games and I don't play for more than an hour or two at a time.
For me, I think subbing for a month here and there is worth it. But not every month. I paid $80 last January for a year of PS Plus Premium and I think I got my money's worth so far. At that price, it's about equal to buying 1 AAA game. Not gonna pay the new $160/year price though. Don't know how people that are paying $180/year think it's a good deal for gamepass either. I guess I don't game enough for either one of those scenarios and when I do game, it's usually a game that isn't on either of those subscriptions.
@hardwenzen: Can you share some knowledge about the physics of this game? I hear you can blow up mounds of cheese on the moon with a grenade. But I also heard the grenade explosion has zero effect on the player. From the little I know about physics, this doesn't make sense. Please post more videos.
@hardwenzen: is putting in the work for us. Saving us countless hours of precious time and our hard earned money. You should appreciate what he's doing. Subscribe to his patreon if he has one so the work can continue.
Odd list. Just because they released a console a month or even a year before the competition, doesn't mean they pioneered it or responsible for the tech advancement. I'm all for competition on hardware though. I'm sure someone could make a similar list with what Sony and Nintendo have accomplished also. And I think Stadia did cloud gaming before the Series consoles were out.
Log in to comment