Dead voting.

If you do not think there is any election fraud, you can check random names of dead people in key swing states to see if they voted. Here's one you can try. This is Pennsylvania's official voter registration website. https://www.pavoterservices.pa.gov/Pages/BallotTracking.aspx

Keep in mind the oldest living person in the United States is 115, a woman by the name of Hester Ford holds that record.

Type this information into the PA website listed above.

___

Kirstin

Cercone

11/17/1894

PHILADELPHIA

___

And the result? This dead woman registered to vote via mail-in on October 7th, and her vote was recorded October 30th. She voted. And I know what people will say to try to excuse this kind of crap, that it's just one person. No, this is just one example, people have checked other names of dead people to confirm it's a significant number. This is the reason reason for mail-in voting, because in-person voting disenfranchises the dead. This is also why left wing groups are protesting "count every vote" as opposed to every LEGAL vote. Not having a system to verify voters is the real threat to our "democracy" as some of you would put it.

It is over, deal with it.

All your predictions were wrong.

Don't say that I did not warn you, I tried to.

Because it's completely inconceivable that someone born in 1984 could have made a typo.

Is this phenomena even replicable? How many names has anyone found where this works for someone who is assuredly dead? Do you have any assurance that this is verifying dead votes in any significant number?

Yall need to get a fucking grip.

Then that person entered information for someone who doesn't exist, still managed to register, and still voted. So either you're saying there's gross incompetence in the system that allows false information to be used to register people who do not exist, or nefarious election fraud.

Show proof that this happened on any kind of scale beyond the extreme statistical outlying anomalies and you may have something. Show proof that this person does not exist and it isn't simply the case that no one caught a birth date typo.

Otherwise shut up.

I am glad you are trying to cling on, I know most people wanted a blue wave but this is far better.

The Florida results gave trumpers such joy they were sure of the sweep. The slow and steady days on days of the eradication of trumps lead is beautiful.

Keep clinging on in there the tears are wonderful.

Here's another one for you. Michigan states voter registration site. https://mvic.sos.state.mi.us/Voter/Index

Information.

William

Bradley

March

1902

48207 (Detroit zipcode)

And the results. William Bradley was born in Alabama in 1902 and he is confirmed to have died in Michigan in 1984. But.. he voted. So much for your precious "democracy." But hey, as long as your side gets power, who cares if elections are legitimate or not, right comrades?

You seem to be broken, your usual yes men are gone.

Biden will win by over 300 EC votes, deal with it.

If there's there's clear widespread fraud it should be easy for Trump's lawyers to make the case. Just relax.

@eoten: Oh shit, you're telling me in a voting turnout of 145,000,000, this kind of easily explained discrepancy happened twice?! Stop the goddamn presses.

Just crawl back into your hidey hole and wait this one out, you can hibernate for the season and then waste all of your restored energy bitching once Biden's in office.

I guess those election bets aren't going so well.

Did I say it happened twice? Does giving you two examples so you can look it up for yourself means there are only two examples? Your train of logic has no fuel, does it? These are called examples, there are thousands of cases of it, and it's the subject of the upcoming court battle where you're going to see hundreds of thousands of illegitimate ballots tossed out.

Checked, nothing matched. You were wrong, stop making excuses and go.

Where are the "thousands of cases?" I already told you to provide proof and you farted out a couple grabs, there are no verified reports of mass fraud. Finding two extremely dubious examples that, by the way, don't even show that their vote was actually counted only that ballots were received, is only proof that you've grown utterly pathetic and desperate. "Look them up yourself" is not a fucking answer. Election officials have found 0 evidence of mass fraud, the SC is already blocking efforts to stop voting, and even after winning their PA case the GOP hasn't found anything. It's OVER.

You've consistently been completely incorrect about the direction of this election and compounding on that just makes you look worse and worse. For your own sake, it's time to bail.

It's going to court, all of it. It'll make its way to the supreme court. Mail in ballot harvesting is now proven to be the vehicle for the greatest amount of election fraud in US history. Pay attention to the upcoming hearings.

Oh okay so now the evidence isn't even "look it up yourself," it's devolved to "just you wait and see." Hooooo leee shit.

So farm trolls now have this new script?

Why do you think the left was promoting mail in voting so much. It was their only chance of winning and so far, it looks like it worked. Well, maybe.

This is not over. There’s computer glitches in Michigan (all in Biden’s favour) and the software has been used in over 40 other counties. Magic ballots that turn up (again, all in Democrat’s favour). Employees throwing away votes (caught on video). USPS employees changing dates on invalid cards. Etc etc. This is a grandiose mess.

It’s far from over.

Well hang on, let's give Eoten a chance to find 29,000 similar examples in PA...and then we'll give him a chance to show these were fabricated by Democrat voters...and that all 29,000 voted for Biden...

If that all checks out, maybe he has a point, and maybe we should pay more attention to the pathetic death wails of Trump's presidency.

If he can't show that, then...meh? One example of uncomfirmed voter fraud in two different states =/= mass voter fraud, so it means bugger all for the outcome of this election.

Lol. Trump supporters are taking this hard. Trumps case will get tossed, again.

LMAO. Do you need a soother?

You do know that in order to get a mail in ballot in Pennsylvania you had to provide proof of identification don't you?

So if someone transposed the date of birth somewhere along the way and and that is reflected in the tracker system to allow the public a convenience.....well who cares?

Seriously, this again?

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/nov/05/facebook-posts/dead-voters-detroits-voter-rolls-including-person-/

Just accept the fact that Trump was a terrible president and after 4 years people had enough. Maybe he would have gotten a second term if,

1. Didn't pass a policy that effectively raised the taxes on the middle class.
2. Didn't pass a policy which allowed for companies to easily pollute rivers.
3. Didn't have someone in his administration push for nonsense like "Alternative Facts"
4. Didn't massively increase drone strikes after Obama in his first 2 years.
5. Didn't assassinate an 8 year old american citizen.
6. Didn't have a complete lack foresight for the reactions for any of their actions, such as the Muslim Ban.
7. Didn't appoint controversial SCOTUS judges like Niel Gorsuch and later on ACB.
8. Didn't disband Global Health Security Team in 2018, meant to fight Pandemics.
9. Didn't turn america into an international laughing stock with Angela Merkel having to explain something to Trump 9 times.
10. Didn't back out of Trade Deals (such as the TPP), that was a massive blow to the US on the geopolitical scale.
11. Didn't side with Neo-Nazis calling them very fine people.
12. Didn't start a trade war with china, one which China effortlessly got around, while America only suffered more and more.
13. Didn't back out of the Paris Agreement.
14. Didn't mess up US farmers so much forcing them to rely on welfare from the state.
15. Didn't Waste money on vanity projects like the Space Force or the Wall.
16. Didn't embrace obsolete energy sources such as coal, while neglecting ones that actually have a future (solar).
17. Didn't let ICE get away with family seperations or the ohter really disturbing stuff they did.
18. Didn't conspire with Russia, which was eventually proven and got himself impeached.
19. Didn't lie, about a coming pandemic. Even though he had intel showing how bad it would be.
20. Didn't completely mess up the lockdown, locking down china but NOT europe (and I say this as a european)
21. Didn't mess up to properly lead america at the time of protests. Even when the protests were extremelly popular.
22. Didn't tell people to drink bleach to get rid of COVID 19.
23. Didn't promote hydroxycholoquine even though medical experts were suggesting against it at the time.
24. Didn't downplay masks.
25. Didn't have an anti-vaxxer stance until it suddenly got extremely politically convenient.
26. Didn't villify the left and democrats at EVERY opportunity
27. Didn't attempt to gut USPS

People had enough of this failure of a president. And I hope Sid Meier replaces Dan Quayle with Donald Trump.

I put in Kirstin's information and got this message:

We are unable to match your information with our records.

You may edit your information and try your search again or you may contact your county election office to confirm the status of your ballot.

@judaspete: TC is too much of a ding dong to even get his bot farm script down properly, but it does technically work, you need to enter "Kristin" for the first name.

Great, if he's writing about it, some group of domestic terrorists are probably stalking this person outside her home.

If you can't see the voter fraud that's happened this election you're just turning a blind eye towards it cause your guy is ahead. It's beyond obvious at this point.

@Sevenizz: it’s over. We’ll all have to endure the final pathetic vanity charade by Trump before he finally crawls back into his hole repudiated......but it’s over.

Well Eoten, I have to give you some credit for showing your face here again after such arrogant and cocky predictions in such condescension to others so many times, but in fairness I was with you. I thought Trump was going to take it also.

But come on. Biden is on course to win over 300 electorals if trends hold, do you honestly believe the numbers are out there to overturn that? MAYBE it will flip a state, hell, let’s assume two. How about three? Fine. Trump still loses. The margins are enough. Any court is going to be extremely reticent to touch the results of an election as it risks fundamentally undermining the bedrock of democracy and the public’s trust in the process, UNLESS it’s neck and neck and there is undeniable, ironclad proof to substantiate the claim on a large scale. I don’t believe it’s there, and I especially don’t believe it’s there because it's something that Trump is claiming is true. That’s an immediate guarantee it’s 💯 bullshit. You’ll have a few instances of inaccuracies and mistakes, the natural byproduct of an imperfect, massive logistical undertaking such as an election, but what you’re expecting is unrealistic. I’m skeptical courts will even touch it, to be honest.

America has some of the best electoral integrity in the world. This ain’t our first rodeo, we’re not Iraq popping our democratic cherry, we’ve been doing this for centuries now. If what Trump is claiming is true, it’s curious that the Senate didn’t flip. Nothing screams the stealing of an election using voter fraud quite like failing to benefit the incoming incumbent with a majority in Congress that would allow him to be far more effectual.

Truth is, this is nothing but the Right’s Russiagate. And you know what? Best expect to get the exact same reactions that you all used in response to it: laughter, mockery and dismissals.

Trump won in ‘16, he lost in ‘20. You guys need to deal with it.

@Vaasman: Still doesn’t work.

@eoten: Voter fraud does in fact happen in the US.

It’s been studied before. The rate is 0.00006%.

Voter impersonation (also sometimes called in-person voter fraud) is a form of electoral fraud in which a person who is eligible to vote in an election votes more than once, or a person who is not eligible to vote does so by voting under the name of an eligible voter. In the United States, voter ID laws have been enacted in a number of states by Republican legislatures and governors since 2010 with the purported aim of preventing voter impersonation. Existing research and evidence shows that voter impersonation is extremely rare. Over a recent 14-year period, there were only 31 documented cases of voter impersonation. There is no evidence that it has changed the result of any election. In April 2020, a 20-year voter fraud study by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found the level of fraud "exceedingly rare" since it occurs only in "0.00006 percent" of instances nationally, and, in one state, "0.000004 percent — about five times less likely than getting hit by lightning in the United States."

Here is a list of so far 7,887 people in Michigan alone who have voted. Of these, 6,553 are confirmed to be dead, and the list is growing.

https://controlc.com/7c96196a

It's why they're also scared shitless of voter ID. They couldn't give a shit about honest, fair elections or "democracy." They want their side to win by any means necessary, and will overlook blatant, widespread election fraud to achieve it. Like good little socialists.

Oh this is soooooo delicious, keep going guys.

I am curious to see who realises it is over first, you two or trump.

Yeah no one is going to click on your controlc link there, it looks shady as hell.

Guys it's the DEEP STATE!!! got the message from this guy called Q.

@tenaka2: it is pretty tasty, I must admit.

You are missing the bright side... trump said he will leave the country when he loses... he could go anywhere, he could even go to.... Canada! Imagine!

@eoten: Its been debunked

https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2020/11/06/no-evidence-thousands-dead-people-cast-ballots-wayne-county/6195468002/

Such delicious irony.

@eoten: no one is saying there isn't election fraud, people are saying it's statistically insignificant to the point it might as well be considered nonexistent.

But hey if you think Trump deserves another 0.005% of the vote that is voter fraud, he can have it.

TRUMP STILL LOSES!

He is not wrong though; Trump is a symptom of people's dissatisfaction. The right are just too ignorant to realize Trump capitalized on that and is using them.

I almost voted libertarian this election because I don't want "The Squad" and Kamala to have any allies in the White House.

The world isn't going to end in six years. Fire suppression for 100+ years led to historically bad fires, not global warming. COVID is bad but not that bad, Sweden seems to be doing just fine. And yes, there is a HUGE bias on the left-leaning media and people need to realize that the media is arguably the biggest failure of the 21st century (after social media and Trump himself).

What's the opposite of liberal tears?

He was 100% wrong, he said trump was going to win and he lost badly. The rest of your post is science denial and not worth addressing.

Ah after a few days they return with a new script. This is just sad.

When the whole Trump campaign was trying to delegitimize, they and their puppets need some sort of fake "conspiracy" to excuse their failure.

The most hilarious part is that if Trump was more focused in running a clean campaign instead of spreading lies he might have galvanized his own base to vote by mail too and possibly have a few more decisive votes. But he just can't, he's a con.

Rofl at these sore losers.

Imagine the shitstorm if Trump's lawyers invalid fraudulent votes and he wins elections against all the odds. Oh dear, thanks god I live in Canada LOL

Odds are, whatever fraudulent votes are few and far inbetween. Even if we were to count all the cases of voter fraud since Clinton, all combined would not even be enough for Trump to take back Georgia.

We're not. We had some of the highest deaths per capita, and our economy was hit just as badly.

Edit: Seriously? That is a strange bug.

Regarding the fake news and conspiracy theory being spread in this thread by our resident farm troll, the story regarding William Bradley was already debunked a few days ago.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/nov/05/facebook-posts/no-dead-voter-named-william-bradley-didnt-vote-det/?fbclid=IwAR1jCcRc9Z3Tb7r-TM8IONuIXr0hVqtamIWtsQhyWSQuiO4tW3DrpnF00rg

@ghost_of_phobos: LOL they lost. Guess they're unemployed now.