This topic is locked from further discussion.
The PS3 is not strong enough to EVER do these graphics EVER. End of Story the 360 is FLEXING on the PS3 right now and is showing the PS3 who his DADDY IS.
Fact PS3 can not duplicate the graphics of the 360 on the same level EVER!!!
GamerGuy07360
i doubt every lemming is hyping this game for its okish 360 graphics, there hyping it 4 the roleplay possibilities
[QUOTE="blacktorn"]FF13 looks better,but that's ecpected from an late 2008 (US release),it is the best looking game yet for the 360,and ps3.mythrolPlease. no. Don't start something like this. Not here in SW. Lol your right...O.O I started a thread stating FFXIII is the best looking game ive seen.....and systemwars went into a frenzy.
Found that thread::)http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=25202369
To say PS3 cant do that is ignorant. If 360 can do it PS3 can do it and if PS3 can do it 360 can do it.MGS9150
This man speaks truth. Also graphics sometimes are a matter of opinion. And I own a 360 just so you know.
Please. no. Don't start something like this. Not here in SW. Lol your right...O.O I started a thread stating FFXIII is the best looking game ive seen.....and systemwars went into a frenzy.[QUOTE="mythrol"][QUOTE="blacktorn"]FF13 looks better,but that's ecpected from an late 2008 (US release),it is the best looking game yet for the 360,and ps3.killab2oo5
Found that thread::)http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=25202369
Maybe because you challenged the 360 to product games that look as good as FFXIII in your thread title. I think FFXIII looks good, but when I look at the pictures all I see are over saturated, bright colors and a good art direction. No shaders hardly to be seen. From a graphical standpoint Gears is more impressive. Art direction is another subject. But the two are different.Look at that amazing texture deatil and shadowing :roll:mrboo15he looks croocked eyed in my screen :o
IF that pic with the monster character is really in game, it is the single most beautifull in game pic i have ever seen
And i have never seen as good lighting too this gen
The PS3 is not strong enough to EVER do these graphics EVER. End of Story the 360 is FLEXING on the PS3 right now and is showing the PS3 who his DADDY IS.
Fact PS3 can not duplicate the graphics of the 360 on the same level EVER!!!
GamerGuy07360
So let me get this straight, an opinion of a fanboy is now a fact? :| :lol:
Because a console out like a year before another one isn't going to have had more time for the devs to get used to it :roll:
with all this talk of oblivion , didnt anyone just read the ps3 hands on? it says the ps3 graphics are better and the loading time is quicker, it would seem not all is what it seems when it comes down to the gimpy PS3 Vs the Poopy 360Darklayk
1UP CONFIRMED PS3 has no AA in Oblivion !!! A jaggy fest is all this game is about on PS3 !!!!
Check the laughable armor full of jaggies, and the blurry grass
Please... in 3 years this graphics will look old, both in ps3 and 360. Stick to plain "ps3 sucks cause i say so!" threads, works better.ZeLeamI agree, both systems will crap all over that in 3-4 years...
I concur, that's the best in-engine pic I've ever seen.IF that pic with the monster character is really in game, it is the single most beautifull in game pic i have ever seen
And i have never seen as good lighting too this gen
avenger_dot
[QUOTE="mrboo15"] Look at that amazing texture deatil and shadowing :roll:TheWiikestLinkhe looks croocked eyed in my screen :o Wow those are gorgeous graphics!
[QUOTE="Darklayk"]with all this talk of oblivion , didnt anyone just read the ps3 hands on? it says the ps3 graphics are better and the loading time is quicker, it would seem not all is what it seems when it comes down to the gimpy PS3 Vs the Poopy 360avenger_dot
1UP CONFIRMED PS3 has no AA in Oblivion !!! A jaggy fest is all this game is about on PS3 !!!!
Check the laughable armor full of jaggies, and the blurry grass
LOL TCHBOI think the PS3 could do it, but with less texture.verbalfilth
And without AA at all, if you think those minor jaggies are bad, imagine on PS3 with no AA like Oblivion, just plainly put, PS3 SUCKS in multiplatforms, end of story
1 whole year more to make Oblivion, and the only thing better, the better far textures comes to 360 before PS3 version is even out
[QUOTE="killab2oo5"]Please. no. Don't start something like this. Not here in SW. Lol your right...O.O I started a thread stating FFXIII is the best looking game ive seen.....and systemwars went into a frenzy.[QUOTE="mythrol"][QUOTE="blacktorn"]FF13 looks better,but that's ecpected from an late 2008 (US release),it is the best looking game yet for the 360,and ps3.mythrol
Found that thread::)http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=25202369
Maybe because you challenged the 360 to product games that look as good as FFXIII in your thread title. I think FFXIII looks good, but when I look at the pictures all I see are over saturated, bright colors and a good art direction. No shaders hardly to be seen. From a graphical standpoint Gears is more impressive. Art direction is another subject. But the two are different.[QUOTE="Sgt_Hale"]Don't be rediculous. The PS3 will have dozens of games to match these graphics. It's taken a year for the 360 to start producing amazing graphics...
It's only taken the PS3 3 months :wink:
GamerGuy07360
Ahh can someone please post some Kameo pics of a YEAR OLD launch game that SMOKES all PS3 games thus far and even in development.
Oh and can we please have some MGS4 pics to show those bad wall and ground limited 256MB textures.
It just so happens that the ps3 version of Oblivion will be better than the 360 version (better long distance textures, faster load times etc), at least that's what I read in that other thread regarding the issue.
[QUOTE="highlander0659"][QUOTE="Nagidar"][QUOTE="highlander0659"][QUOTE="GamerGuy07360"][QUOTE="highlander0659"]Seeing as how the PS3 is superior to the 360. Logic dictates that the PS3 can not only match this but far surpass it. Just how the PS3 far surpasses the 360 in general.Nagidar
LMAO LMAO:lol: You can not be for real are you.
Have you been under a rock? The 360 graphics are better then PS3 and every major developer just about has come out and confirmed this.
:lol:
You're so foolish. The PS3's ability far surpasses the 360's. Even John Carmack said so. Besides the PS3's displays now are irrelevant. We all know that launch titles can tell us nothing about a console. I thought that you fools would have learned that by now. You Lemmings sure are too ignorant for words. When you add the system bandwidth, memory bandwidth, SPE local storage cycles being so incredibly low per miss, the highly parallized structure of Cell itself, the RSX's shader capabilities, Cells shader capabilities and rendering capabilities, Blu-Ray and the standard HDD .... well .... lemme just put it this way. The games showcased for the PS3 right now probably aren't even really using 5% of the systems resources or potential. Whilst the 360 uses over a third of its power. As time goes on the PS3's superiority will become more and more apparent.BS, quit spreading crap, John Carmack said the PS3 had higher peak numbers and even said SONY made a mistake with the componant choices and architecture in the PS3.
He said there's a higher peak performance. Which means that the PS3 is technically superior and can produce better graphics and ect. However, he also said that it's more difficult to develop for. But that's changed with the PS3's octopiler. It's a special type of compiler that greatly simplifies the PS3's game development. Let me break it down for you:
The PS3's peak specs were with all 8 SPE's running at maximum power, when in fact, the PS3 will only use 6 SPE's for games (1 reserved for the OS and the other can be used for games if requested), with that, the actual peak the Cell can produce with 6 SPE's is around 153 TFLOPS compared to the Xenon's 115 TFLOPS, with how both consoles architecture works, the PS3 will pull around 114 TFLOPS and the 360 around 103 TFLOPS, PS3 does in fact have the advantage as far as processing power, but not nearly as much as SONY wanted everyone to believe, the PS3's architecture allows it to run at around 75% efficiency, while the 360's runs at around 90%.
 The second part of this is the GPU's, I won't even get into that, everyone knows that deal.
Third, the PS3 is also bottlenecked as far as available RAM and how the RAM works, for the Cell to access the other 256MB of the PS3's RAM, it would create latency issues, which is probably why devs do not do it.
Saying the PS3 has superior hardware is just plain false.
Read this. link
[QUOTE="MGS9150"]To say PS3 cant do that is ignorant. If 360 can do it PS3 can do it and if PS3 can do it 360 can do it.lawlessxEpic said gears of war wont run on the ps3 afew months back...and seeing how badly the ps3 oblivion is turning out..i believe them.
ok so since the ps3 verison of oblivion is better then the 360 verison i guess gears would run better on the ps3
thanks for a being a dumb fanboy
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment