The Verge - Microsofts overall gaming revenues are only up thanks to Activision Blizzard

  • 185 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Avatar image for nnoyinghusband
NNoyingHusband

1042

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#51 NNoyingHusband
Member since 2020 • 1042 Posts

@Antwan3K: imagine coping so hard that you’re going to compare data that doesn’t exist. “Well the truth would be different if Xbox didn’t own ABK.” Oh…k? But they do? So…? The world we live in now is one in which MS owns ABK. The financials don’t change because fanboys are upset.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#52 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 69618 Posts

@Antwan3K said:

"without ABK" isn't a thing because Microsoft/Xbox owns ABK..

"Bu buh but...."

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 44107 Posts

lol :P

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12311

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#54 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12311 Posts

There's no hiding from the fact that Xbox's traditional business is facing some significant headwinds and is in a more difficult position than its competitors but, this is expected when their larger vision requires a tradeoff. The biggest challenge is how well they can execute that vision in the near and mid-term.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

44243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#55 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 44243 Posts

Oh boy! The Activision/Blizzard/King acquisition by Microsoft sure eats away at some people’s souls. 😅

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#56 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 69618 Posts

@Archangel3371 said:

Oh boy! The Activision/Blizzard/King acquisition by Microsoft sure eats away at some people’s souls. 😅

You will think they would be over it by now.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

44243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#57 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 44243 Posts

@Pedro: You would think so but it does fit the narrative of them not loving their system, they just hate your’s. 😂

Avatar image for ghostofgolden
GhostOfGolden

2507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#58 GhostOfGolden
Member since 2023 • 2507 Posts

A simplified breakdown for all the Lems who are seemingly confused by the numbers. Activision “boosted” their revenue metric (which would have been down yoy otherwise) but ultimately cost Xbox $350 million because of poor margins and operating costs. Congrats?

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

17830

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 osan0
Member since 2004 • 17830 Posts

God damn, Activision is a big ol beast. Anywho no real point in reading too much into those figures at the moment either positive or negative. The sheer size of the acquisition is going to distort figures and trends in the short term.

ABK is MS....it is Xbox now. So the growth YOY is there. It's really the next few years that will be interesting. Will it continue to grow strongly YOY (not as big as this jump of course)? Or will it be very small growth after this big jump?

I do suspect we will see another round of layoffs at Xbox before years end though sadly :(. Just due to the sheer size of getting ABK, there is still going to be a lot of process to sift through.

So no need for concern and no cause to gloat.....yet.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#60 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 69618 Posts

@Archangel3371 said:

@Pedro: You would think so but it does fit the narrative of them not loving their system, they just hate your’s. 😂

We have one still trying to cope with ABK being Xbox.

Avatar image for Antwan3K
Antwan3K

8112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61  Edited By Antwan3K
Member since 2005 • 8112 Posts
@osan0 said:

[...]

ABK is MS....it is Xbox now. So the growth YOY is there.

[...]

It's a rather simple concept that TC and other cows can't seem to cope with..

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

44243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#62 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 44243 Posts

@Pedro: The struggle is indeed real. 😂

Avatar image for tjandmia
tjandmia

3736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#63 tjandmia
Member since 2017 • 3736 Posts

The Xbox brand is almost done. Consumers have spoken.

Avatar image for Antwan3K
Antwan3K

8112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64  Edited By Antwan3K
Member since 2005 • 8112 Posts
@tjandmia said:

The Xbox brand is almost done. Consumers have spoken.

Considering the fact that the Xbox brand has more monthly-active-users than Nintendo and generates more gaming revenue than Nintendo; if the Xbox brand is "dead", what does that make Nintendo?.. 🤔

Out of the big three, maybe it's just time to admit (and accept) that Xbox is solidly #2 in gaming with potential to become #1 depending on how consumers react to Call of Duty marketing shifting away from PlayStation..

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#65 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 69618 Posts

@tjandmia said:

The Xbox brand is almost done. Consumers have spoken.

Xbox is the brand that folks like you have been saying is dead for over a decade. I am surprised you haven't got the memo after all these years.🤷🏾‍♂️

Avatar image for Macutchi
Macutchi

10463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#66 Macutchi
Member since 2007 • 10463 Posts

you'd expect there to be massive integration costs for both bethesda and activision so soon after the acquisitions. as a gamer i'll be happier when (hopefully not if) we start to see bethesda's name in amongst positive gaming division news

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

58363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#67 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 58363 Posts

@palasta said:
@mrbojangles25 said:

Wow, it's almost like MS sort of knows how to run a business...

...and this is...bad? Is that what the tone of the OP is implying?

That MS is bad for purchasing a company and being more profitable? I mean, you could argue that from a socialist or anti-capitalist stance of course (I certainly would!) but from a business stance I fail to see how this is bad.

nDurr..hurr.. wha..?

Why did MS make all those recent big acquisitions? Not because they were doing great in the videogame business. It's because they lost tremendously and had nothing because they were sleeping for 20 years, otherwise they were bound to lose even more ground. As a reminder, it's the biggest acquisition in videogame history by faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar. Sony doesn't even come close with all of the studios they acquired over time. Yeasure, "MS knows how to do business".

Some people don't keep a lot considering how much time they spent on this board.

Yes I am being a bit of a smartass but it's just funny because people are like "MS only profitable because they do business things! WEAKSAUCE!" and I'm sitting here like "Well...that's how businesses make profit, by doing business things." lol.

Big companies eat little(r) companies, grow big and strong! RAWR!

MS does it. Sony does it. I imagine even Nintendo does it.

It's also important to remember that MS is a trillion dollar company and relative to the whole company the acquisition, while large, is likely a more reasonable % as opposed to if you are just basing it off their game division/xbox brand.

Avatar image for ghostofgolden
GhostOfGolden

2507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#68 GhostOfGolden
Member since 2023 • 2507 Posts

Revenue is down and Activision Blizzard ended up costing Xbox money. No software and services growth. Hardware spiraling down the toilet. And folks here wanna spin this as a positive? It’s Twilight Zone up in this place

Avatar image for Antwan3K
Antwan3K

8112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Antwan3K
Member since 2005 • 8112 Posts

"if you exclude Activision Blizzard".. 🤡

Avatar image for kvallyx
KvallyX

13013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 5

#70 KvallyX
Member since 2019 • 13013 Posts

@ghostofgolden said:

Story

Total Gaming Revenue: +51%(-4% w/o ABK)

Content and Services Revenue +62%(+1% w/o ABK)

Hardware Revenue -31%

“Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

This is the second quarter in a row that Microsoft is including its additional revenue from its Activision Blizzard acquisition that briefly pushed gaming to be Microsoft’s third-largest business. This time around, gaming is back into fourth place behind Windows thanks to stronger than expected Windows OEM revenue this quarter.”

“Despite a strong quarter for Microsoft with Office revenue and Microsoft Cloud revenue up 23 percent year over year, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenues are only up thanks to Activision Blizzard, with Xbox hardware revenue tanking this quarter alongside devices (Surface) revenue also dropping once again.”

“Over on the Xbox and gaming side, Xbox content and services revenue, which includes Xbox Game Pass, is up by 62 percent. This is once again thanks to Activision Blizzard revenues making up the bulk of revenue.

This quarter, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent, a big drop following a soft quarter for Xbox sales during the all-important holiday season last year. Microsoft admits the obvious in its earnings filing: that the big drop was “driven by lower volume of consoles sold.”

Overall, gaming revenue is up 51 percent, bolstered by the additional Activision Blizzard revenue, which contributed 55 points of net impact. That means without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter. The newly acquired division recorded $1.97 billion in revenue during Q3, but the cost of integration, transaction costs, and other costs of revenue in total $980 million. With other operating expenses ($1.34 billion), it calculates to an overall operating loss of $350 million for Activision Blizzard.“

Hardware on a sharp decline. ABK saving the revenue numbers but actually totaling to an operating loss… Gaming back in 4th behind Windows… Let’s see the Lems spin this news…

Makes sense. Sonys revenue is where it’s at because of all their acquisition. No surprises

Avatar image for ghostofgolden
GhostOfGolden

2507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#71 GhostOfGolden
Member since 2023 • 2507 Posts

@Antwan3K said:

"if you exclude Activision Blizzard".. 🤡

If you take out the number bloating their revenue (and operating losses 🤭) you can see losses in every segment in Xboxs gaming business. Meaning their strategies aren’t working. And a year from now they can’t hide behind ABK numbers. There’ll just be losses across the board. And following the trends the losses will be HUGE 🤷🏾‍♂️

Avatar image for Antwan3K
Antwan3K

8112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72  Edited By Antwan3K
Member since 2005 • 8112 Posts
@ghostofgolden said:
@Antwan3K said:

"if you exclude Activision Blizzard".. 🤡

[...]

a year from now they can’t hide behind ABK numbers. There’ll just be losses across the board.

[...]

Maybe you should wait to see what happens in a year then..

Because right now, Xbox content/services revenue went up 62% with an overall increase in gaming revenue of 51%.. 🤷🏽‍♂️

Microsoft owns ABK.. ABK is Xbox.. "excluding ABK" isn't a thing.. Just cope with that simple fact and stop with the perpetual spinning..

Avatar image for palasta
palasta

1397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#73 palasta
Member since 2017 • 1397 Posts

@mrbojangles25 said:
@palasta said:
@mrbojangles25 said:

Wow, it's almost like MS sort of knows how to run a business...

...and this is...bad? Is that what the tone of the OP is implying?

That MS is bad for purchasing a company and being more profitable? I mean, you could argue that from a socialist or anti-capitalist stance of course (I certainly would!) but from a business stance I fail to see how this is bad.

nDurr..hurr.. wha..?

Why did MS make all those recent big acquisitions? Not because they were doing great in the videogame business. It's because they lost tremendously and had nothing because they were sleeping for 20 years, otherwise they were bound to lose even more ground. As a reminder, it's the biggest acquisition in videogame history by faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar. Sony doesn't even come close with all of the studios they acquired over time. Yeasure, "MS knows how to do business".

Some people don't keep a lot considering how much time they spent on this board.

Yes I am being a bit of a smartass but it's just funny because people are like "MS only profitable because they do business things! WEAKSAUCE!" and I'm sitting here like "Well...that's how businesses make profit, by doing business things." lol.

Big companies eat little(r) companies, grow big and strong! RAWR!

MS does it. Sony does it. I imagine even Nintendo does it.

It's also important to remember that MS is a trillion dollar company and relative to the whole company the acquisition, while large, is likely a more reasonable % as opposed to if you are just basing it off their game division/xbox brand.

Neither Sony nor Nintendo had to swallow a major portion of the industry to make up for their failures. When Nintendos WiiU failed, and hard it did fail, they were able to recover since Nintendo cultivated and expanded their assets, the basis for their successful persistence over decades. How many studios did Nintendo acquire in the meantime? Do you actually have any idea?

Btw. you know MS themselves admitted why they "forced" to make "good business", resp.

"But it's just the truth of the matter is that when you're in third place in the console marketplace. And the top two players are as strong as they are and have in certain cases a very discrete focus on doing deals and other things that kind of make being Xbox hard for us as a team. That's on us, not on anybody else.

"We lost the worst generation to lose in the Xbox One generation, where everybody built their digital library of games. When you go and you're building on Xbox we want our Xbox community to feel awesome, but this idea that if we just focused more on great games on our console that somehow we're going to win the console race doesn't really lay into the reality of most people

https://www.vgchartz.com/article/457086/phil-spencer-we-lost-the-worst-generation-to-lose-in-the-xbox-one-generation/

Even Spencer gives a see-through to how much they suck, while blaming the big mean competition.

@Archangel3371 said:

@Pedro: You would think so but it does fit the narrative of them not loving their system, they just hate your’s. 😂

Begs the question, why are you so focused on a piece of electronic entertainment, when it really is the company behind the system. MS is objectively inept, only able to keep up by investing huge amounts of cash - starting with losing 5b on the og Xbox - all the while those record investment don't bear much fruit. In the contrary.

Avatar image for saint-george
Saint-George

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#74 Saint-George
Member since 2023 • 1270 Posts

"Begs the question, why are you so focused on a piece of electronic entertainment"

A bit rich coming from a sap who has real emotions towards Sony and a console.

Sony Being in last place got cows tiny minds frazzled 😂🤣

Avatar image for ghostofgolden
GhostOfGolden

2507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#75 GhostOfGolden
Member since 2023 • 2507 Posts

@Antwan3K said:

Microsoft owns ABK.. ABK is Xbox.. "excluding ABK" isn't a thing.. Just cope with that simple fact and stop with the perpetual spinning..

Then why is Xbox giving us the with and without ABK figures? Because it offers context.

Is Xbox spinning too? Goof 😂🤣

Avatar image for TheEroica
TheEroica

22726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 TheEroica  Moderator
Member since 2009 • 22726 Posts

This thread is a study in how the system wars has gone off the rails... We're now dividing portions of businesses to legitimize our points and everyone is an expert analyst In a drastically evolving industry.

Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#77  Edited By Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts

People in this thread struggle to conceptualise why for sake of comparison it can be interesting to look growth by excluding a product line from the equation. This stuff happens all the time.

I used to read similar stories in financial newspapers all the time:

"If you exclude Taycan from the Porsche line up, car sales have down 3%". Doesn't matter than Taycans make up 40% of Porsche's sales, its interesting to learn if it wasn't for the introduction of their first electric vehicle, the company would be performing worse than the year before.

Same with Lambo and the Urus and many other businesses.

It's an interesting abstract... And it's got you all so defensive about it. Y'all need to read financial literature.

Avatar image for Antwan3K
Antwan3K

8112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78  Edited By Antwan3K
Member since 2005 • 8112 Posts
@ghostofgolden said:
@Antwan3K said:

Microsoft owns ABK.. ABK is Xbox.. "excluding ABK" isn't a thing.. Just cope with that simple fact and stop with the perpetual spinning..

Then why is Xbox giving us the with and without ABK figures? Because it offers context.

Is Xbox spinning too? Goof 😂🤣

Nope, just you and other cows.. You've been on constant spin cycle since the ABK acquisition and now you want to "exclude ABK" in order to continue with your fanboy narratives..

I guess we should "exclude Bethesda" whenever it suits you aswell. 🙄

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

44243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#79 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 44243 Posts

@palasta: How am I focused on a piece of electronic equipment? 😐

Avatar image for ghostofgolden
GhostOfGolden

2507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#80 GhostOfGolden
Member since 2023 • 2507 Posts

@TheEroica said:

This thread is a study in how the system wars has gone off the rails... We're now dividing portions of businesses to legitimize our points and everyone is an expert analyst In a drastically evolving industry.

Eroica, XBOX provided this information, not fanboys. They showed us their negative yoy growth without ABK, and how ABK impacted the quarterly results. Ignoring these details and dismissing them as a fanboy narrative is taking us “off the rails.” Xbox thought it was important enough to share. So why do we have to ignore it here?!?

Avatar image for ghostofgolden
GhostOfGolden

2507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#81  Edited By GhostOfGolden
Member since 2023 • 2507 Posts
@Mozelleple112 said:

People in this thread struggle to conceptualise why for sake of comparison it can be interesting to look growth by excluding a product line from the equation. This stuff happens all the time.

It's an interesting abstract... And it's got you all so defensive about it. Y'all need to read financial literature.

Lems need to read financial literature? I’ve been trying to get them to read past the headline for years. Now they even refuse to read what Xbox puts out. They want to be lied to. They want to feel special. They want to be on the “winning” side. Anything beyond that is “spin.”

Avatar image for Antwan3K
Antwan3K

8112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82  Edited By Antwan3K
Member since 2005 • 8112 Posts

That +62% to Xbox content/services revenue and +51% to overall gaming revenue really has the damage control in overdrive.. 😏

"b bu but we should exclude ABK!1!!" 😭🤡

Avatar image for ghostofgolden
GhostOfGolden

2507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#83 GhostOfGolden
Member since 2023 • 2507 Posts

@Antwan3K said:

That +62% to Xbox content/services and +51% to overall gaming revenue really has the damage control in overdrive.. 😏

"b bu but we should exclude ABK!1!!" 😭🤡

I know right? Why would Xbox exclude ABK like that in their quarterly financial report? What a bunch of Cows!1!

🤡

Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#84 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts

@ghostofgolden: its how attached these people are to a piece of plastic. I thought it was a very interesting read.

It shows why MS was willing to splurge $70 billion on the largest videogame publisher.

It might not be as bad an investment as previously thought.

Avatar image for ghostofgolden
GhostOfGolden

2507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#85 GhostOfGolden
Member since 2023 • 2507 Posts

@Mozelleple112 said:

@ghostofgolden: its how attached these people are to a piece of plastic. I thought it was a very interesting read.

It shows why MS was willing to splurge $70 billion on the largest videogame publisher.

It might not be as bad an investment as previously thought.

Xbox knows video games will continue to grow. And looking at the other industries, M&A’s is how the big dogs expand their footprint. I just feel like they did things wildly out of order. Buy the big publishers in 2017 and then bang out Game Pass once the entire gaming industry runs through Xbox. There have been a few odd missteps that tells us their executives may have been at odd with what the path forward was. But now it’s pretty clear. Xbox games are going everywhere that video games can be played. The more they slow play this pivot the more money they are leaving on the table.

It doesn’t help that those other pesky companies (Nintendo and PlayStation) continue to succeed outside of what has been dubbed the “future model” of the industry. Consumers shifted to streaming/subscription movies and music damn near instantly. Consumers own nothing and couldn‘t care less. There‘s still a giant segment of gaming consumers that buy games and don’t subscribe to any of the services. In fact they are still the majority. Maybe Xbox is the wrong brand to be leading this charge? 🤷🏾‍♂️

Avatar image for BenjaminBanklin
BenjaminBanklin

11114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 BenjaminBanklin  Online
Member since 2004 • 11114 Posts

The coping needs to stop. Xbox is cooked. They wasted all that money just to tack on Activision's revenue to theirs. In the meantime, hardware is dwilding to nothing everywhere but the US, where Xbox Series still getting soundly beat by PS5 monthly, even though MS is offering a cheaper model.

Xbox has ran out of options but to release games on their rivals' platforms since their hardware base is shrinking rapidly. It's obvious Phil isn't calling the shots on certain decisions with Xbox anymore, and I still don't see how he got to keep his position since he seems to be the reason they are where they are in the console market in the first place.

Avatar image for Antwan3K
Antwan3K

8112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Antwan3K
Member since 2005 • 8112 Posts

@ghostofgolden said:
@Antwan3K said:

That +62% to Xbox content/services and +51% to overall gaming revenue really has the damage control in overdrive.. 😏

"b bu but we should exclude ABK!1!!" 😭🤡

I know right? Why would Xbox exclude ABK like that in their quarterly financial report? What a bunch of Cows!1!

🤡

Microsoft excluded ABK and yet their content/services were up 62% and overall gaming revenue was up 51%?!..

Wow, that's even more impressive than I thought.. 🤡

Avatar image for Antwan3K
Antwan3K

8112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88  Edited By Antwan3K
Member since 2005 • 8112 Posts
@Mozelleple112 said:

@ghostofgolden: its how attached these people are to a piece of plastic. I thought it was a very interesting read.

It shows why MS was willing to splurge $70 billion on the largest videogame publisher.

It might not be as bad an investment as previously thought.

funny you think the people "attached to a piece of plastic" are from the Xbox camp.. the camp that is continually admitting that the console war is over, that Xbox lost the console war, and that the future of Xbox is beyond just concentrating on consoles.. 😐

sure, "without ABK" Xbox would have been down this quarter.. and?.. Xbox has been down before and Xbox has been up before (same with PlayStation).. yet, regardless of if Xbox is up or down for any particular quarter, cows will still spin it into "bad news" for Xbox.. 🤷‍♂️ according to cows, there hasn't been a "good" quarter for Xbox in the last two generations.. something that is factually not true.. Xbox, in terms of revenue, was about twice the size it was during the Xbox 360 generationbefore the ABK deal..

and, like it or not, Xbox bought ABK.. and with ABK, Xbox content/services and overall gaming are up to the tune of 62% and 51% respectively.. and it's the cows (y'know the ones who are so attached to plastic box wars) who can't accept that simple reality..

so bottomline:

if you want to have a good faith discussion about what Xbox/Bethesda/ABK will be generating in revenue a year from now after the dust settles and ABK is completely integrated into whatever business plan Microsoft has, sure.. nothing wrong with that.. if you want to discuss the viability of any plan Microsoft has for Xbox if hardware sales continue to plummet, sure.. fair discussion..

but to "exclude ABK" just to downplay the clearly massive increases to Xbox gaming revenue is just an exercise in damage control.. plain and simple..

Avatar image for ghostofgolden
GhostOfGolden

2507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#89  Edited By GhostOfGolden
Member since 2023 • 2507 Posts
@Antwan3K said:
@ghostofgolden said:
@Antwan3K said:

That +62% to Xbox content/services and +51% to overall gaming revenue really has the damage control in overdrive.. 😏

"b bu but we should exclude ABK!1!!" 😭🤡

I know right? Why would Xbox exclude ABK like that in their quarterly financial report? What a bunch of Cows!1!

🤡

Microsoft excluded ABK and yet their content/services were up 62% and overall gaming revenue was up 51%?!..

Wow, that's even more impressive than I thought.. 🤡

No… When Xbox excluded ABK their numbers were down. Did you not read the report? Xbox spells it all out for you.

These figures were all provided by Xbox in their report…

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#90 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 69618 Posts

All this work and ABK is still Xbox.😂

Avatar image for loudheadphones
loudheadphones

1072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#91 loudheadphones
Member since 2023 • 1072 Posts

@Antwan3K said:
@loudheadphones said:
@Antwan3K said:
@loudheadphones said:
@Antwan3K said:

Xbox content and services revenue, which includes Xbox Game Pass, is up by 62 percent.. Overall, gaming revenue is up 51 percent..

what's to spin?.. 🤔

Microsoft/Xbox owns ABK.. 🤷‍♂️

Gaming revenue without ABK would be 4% down

[...]

Microsoft/Xbox owns ABK.. 🤷‍♂️

That's not the point. Point there wilk be ALWAYS a comparison without ABK. And Xbox is doing bad without.

"without ABK" isn't a thing because Microsoft/Xbox owns ABK..

Good thing is.... ABK don't do shit for Xbox.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#92 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 69618 Posts

@loudheadphones: Except increase their revenue and profits.

Avatar image for silentchief
Silentchief

6903

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#93 Silentchief
Member since 2021 • 6903 Posts

@Antwan3K said:
@ghostofgolden said:
@Antwan3K said:
@ghostofgolden said:

Story

[...]

Let’s see the Lems spin this news…

Over on the Xbox and gaming side, Xbox content and services revenue, which includes Xbox Game Pass, is up by 62 percent.. Overall, gaming revenue is up 51 percent..

what's to spin?.. 🤔

Microsoft/Xbox owns ABK, correct?.. 🤷‍♂️

ABK was down, has an overall operating loss of $350M and yet accounts for 50% of that 51% gaming revenue number. The operating loss part is important. It’s the part I’ve been trying to discuss regarding Nintendo‘s business plan vs Xbox and PS that you like to ignore.

Microsoft owns ABK. ABK is sliding big and losing Microsoft money at the moment. ABK should right in with Game Pass 😂🤣

translation:

Xbox content and services is up 62% and Xbox gaming revenue is up 51%.. how can i spin this to make it out to be bad news for Xbox?.. 🤔🤡

Anyone with a basic knowledge of financial's knows this isn't great news. They only posted an increase because they are comparing the growth to years before they bought the largest third party publisher. Looking at this trend they will be posting negative growth every year after this unless they do something drastic to change the companies they own. It also shows their strategy wasn't working and buying up the industry was all they could do to save face.

Avatar image for loudheadphones
loudheadphones

1072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#94 loudheadphones
Member since 2023 • 1072 Posts

@Pedro said:

@loudheadphones: Except increase their revenue and profits.

LOL. What profits? Where? If there is a profit, Xbox wouldn't go 3rd party. After all these years, Xbots still living in denial

Avatar image for ghostofgolden
GhostOfGolden

2507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#95 GhostOfGolden
Member since 2023 • 2507 Posts

@silentchief said:
@Antwan3K said:

translation:

Xbox content and services is up 62% and Xbox gaming revenue is up 51%.. how can i spin this to make it out to be bad news for Xbox?.. 🤔🤡

Anyone with a basic knowledge of financial's knows this isn't great news. They only posted an increase because they are comparing the growth to years before they bought the largest third party publisher. Looking at this trend they will be posting negative growth every year after this unless they do something drastic to change the companies they own. It also shows their strategy wasn't working and buying up the industry was all they could do to save face.

We clearly aren’t dealing with people with basic knowledge of financials. There’s a few folks here that will just blindly defend Xbox. Thats’s why we have folks here accusing people of spin because they are referencing figures without the ABK revenue, when in reality Xbox themselves provided the figures without the ABK revenue. And now the future Xbox forecasts all look bleak, with hardware projected to be down further and services growth still not moving. This time next year when there’s yoy comparisons with ABK revenue the numbers are gonna be abysmal.

But we’re spinning 😂

Avatar image for Antwan3K
Antwan3K

8112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96  Edited By Antwan3K
Member since 2005 • 8112 Posts
@ghostofgolden said:
@Antwan3K said:
@ghostofgolden said:
@Antwan3K said:

That +62% to Xbox content/services and +51% to overall gaming revenue really has the damage control in overdrive.. 😏

"b bu but we should exclude ABK!1!!" 😭🤡

I know right? Why would Xbox exclude ABK like that in their quarterly financial report? What a bunch of Cows!1!

🤡

Microsoft excluded ABK and yet their content/services were up 62% and overall gaming revenue was up 51%?!..

Wow, that's even more impressive than I thought.. 🤡

No… When Xbox excluded ABK their numbers were down. Did you not read the report? Xbox spells it all out for you.

These figures were all provided by Xbox in their report…

clearly you don't know when you're being made fun of.. 🤡

the point is that, sure, Xbox numbers would be down IF you exclude ABK.. BUT, ABK is Xbox.. and WITH ABK, the numbers are up bigly, as expected.. 🤷‍♂️

not sure what's so hard to understand..

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#97 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 69618 Posts

@loudheadphones: I see that facts are not your favorite topic.🤭

Avatar image for Antwan3K
Antwan3K

8112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Antwan3K
Member since 2005 • 8112 Posts
@silentchief said:
@Antwan3K said:
@ghostofgolden said:
@Antwan3K said:
@ghostofgolden said:

[...]

[...]

[...]

Xbox content and services is up 62% and Xbox gaming revenue is up 51%.. how can i spin this to make it out to be bad news for Xbox?.. 🤔🤡

Anyone with a basic knowledge of financial's knows this isn't great news. They only posted an increase because they are comparing the growth to years before they bought the largest third party publisher. Looking at this trend they will be posting negative growth every year after this unless they do something drastic to change the companies they own. It also shows their strategy wasn't working and buying up the industry was all they could do to save face.

and anyone with basic knowledge knows they bought ABK to increase revenue.. 😐

and *gasp*, it worked..

we'll have to wait and see how things look next year.. but anything before that, is just damage controlling the fact that Xbox content and services is up 62% and Xbox gaming revenue is up 51%..

Avatar image for Antwan3K
Antwan3K

8112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Antwan3K
Member since 2005 • 8112 Posts
@Pedro said:

All this work and ABK is still Xbox.😂

the cows are really having a hard time with this simple logic..

Avatar image for ghostofgolden
GhostOfGolden

2507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#100 GhostOfGolden
Member since 2023 • 2507 Posts

@Antwan3K said:
@ghostofgolden said:

No… When Xbox excluded ABK their numbers were down. Did you not read the report? Xbox spells it all out for you.

These figures were all provided by Xbox in their report…

clearly you don't know when you're being made fun of.. 🤡

the point is that, sure, Xbox numbers would be down IF you exclude ABK.. BUT, ABK is Xbox.. and WITH ABK, the numbers are up bigly, as expected.. 🤷‍♂️

not sure what's so hard to understand..

I didn’t exclude anything. Xbox did. And Xbox excluded ABK to show their losses… Not sure what’s so hard to understand…

🤡😂🤣