in terms of games ps2, in graphics xbox, in terms of multiplayer the gc.game_fanatic
In terms of multiplayer the gc! Whaat?! The Xbox probably equaled the Gamecube in multiplayer and had XBL. How can you say the Gamecube was better without online? Don't take this as me hating the Gamecube, I liked SSBM
Yes, because nobody can have an opinion. :| people can have oppinions but anyone saying it wasnt PS2 first last gen is PURE unadulterated wrong. 2nd and 3rd are debatably but it is fact ps2 was the most balanced console and the best. opinions dont mean squat on this subject
Yes, because nobody can have an opinion. :| people can have oppinions but anyone saying it wasnt PS2 first last gen is PURE unadulterated wrong. 2nd and 3rd are debatably but it is fact ps2 was the most balanced console and the best. opinions dont mean squat on this subject That is so much fanboyism I don't know where to start. you stinkin cows boast about graphics this gen but where were you last gen? Multiplayer PS2 falls 3rd behind GC and Xbox way out in front on that one....... PS2 yes it had MORE games but MOST SUCKED... Xbox had better QUALITY graphics and games that is a fact
Yes, because nobody can have an opinion. :| people can have oppinions but anyone saying it wasnt PS2 first last gen is PURE unadulterated wrong. 2nd and 3rd are debatably but it is fact ps2 was the most balanced console and the best. opinions dont mean squat on this subject TC asked which was better, not which had higher sales or any other metric.
Yes, because nobody can have an opinion. :| people can have oppinions but anyone saying it wasnt PS2 first last gen is PURE unadulterated wrong. 2nd and 3rd are debatably but it is fact ps2 was the most balanced console and the best. opinions dont mean squat on this subject So I'm wrong because I prefer to play online games over Xbox Live? :|
Yes, because nobody can have an opinion. :| people can have oppinions but anyone saying it wasnt PS2 first last gen is PURE unadulterated wrong. 2nd and 3rd are debatably but it is fact ps2 was the most balanced console and the best. opinions dont mean squat on this subject That is so much fanboyism I don't know where to start. you stinkin cows boast about graphics this gen but where were you last gen? Multiplayer PS2 falls 3rd behind GC and Xbox way out in front on that one....... PS2 yes it had MORE games but MOST SUCKED... Xbox had better QUALITY graphics and games that is a fact
Yes, because nobody can have an opinion. :| people can have oppinions but anyone saying it wasnt PS2 first last gen is PURE unadulterated wrong. 2nd and 3rd are debatably but it is fact ps2 was the most balanced console and the best. opinions dont mean squat on this subject That is so much fanboyism I don't know where to start. you stinkin cows boast about graphics this gen but where were you last gen? Multiplayer PS2 falls 3rd behind GC and Xbox way out in front on that one....... PS2 yes it had MORE games but MOST SUCKED... Xbox had better QUALITY graphics and games that is a fact
You are mathematically wrong. When you take the ratio for how many games PS2 had compared to how many of them were awsome games its not a very good lookin ratio in favor of Sony and that is mathematically correct
Yes, because nobody can have an opinion. :| people can have oppinions but anyone saying it wasnt PS2 first last gen is PURE unadulterated wrong. 2nd and 3rd are debatably but it is fact ps2 was the most balanced console and the best. opinions dont mean squat on this subject Wrong, it was technologically inferior and my four favorite franchises last gen were all on the competition....
Action God of War Devil May Cry 3 SE Metal Gear: Sons of Liberty Metal Gear: Snake Eater or Metal Gear 3: Subsistence Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas Okami
RPGs Shadow Hearts 1,2,3 Final fantasy X, Final Fantasy X-2(it is not that bad), Final Fantasy XII Xenosaga I, II(the gameplay is a bit boring, but it is must play if you want to know about the story), III Shin Megami Tensei: Digital Devil Saga I and II Rogue Galaxy Suikoden III, and V Kingdom Hearts 1&2
Figting Tekken Series
SRPGs Disgaea 1&2
Strategy Romance of Three Kingdom Series
Beat up Dynast Warrior Series
Here are just some of the games in the ps2 library.
The GC is the only system that doesnt break down all the friggin time (HUGEBOX is decently durably if you treat it like a God), so Id say the GC. Honestly, what good is a system if it doesnt last? Sure, the PS systems still have games one or two years longer, but the console itself is a piece of crap... Now, when it comes to handhelds, its a different story. The Game Boys were quite durably, but the DS? I had a DS HUGENESS, and I swear it LITERALLY scratched itself somehow. I had it in my room, my dogs were the only other ones home, and went to the RR. When I came back, two or three scratches randomly spawned on the back of the DS. I swear Im not lying. Now, the PSP's screen is pretty prone to smudge and dust too, but I dropped it on its back three times, NOT A SCRATCH. If I had a camera, Id show pics on the intrawebs too. Usually go with Nintendo products, but this time, get a PSP instead of a DS.
for everyone to know i am NOT a cow. i just simply misunderstood the question. imo GC had the best games and controller and system durability. but if u know what games are good then ps2 could have been better. i agree with anoth post. there was SO much crap on ps2 and 1 that u wouldnt believe. alot of it shouldnt even count as games so while the PS2 had the most good games. it had by far the most bad games too. if that was what made a system then gamecube would have won because along with rare 3rd party comes rare bad 3rd party ports sry for the confusion. happy gaming
Log in to comment