Well, thank God! If this is true, then I hope 343 and other studios are constantly working on both Xbox One and Xbox Series X games for that cross platform goodness...even though Halo is being held back by this gen. But that's just fine and dandy...as long as teh fanboys get teh Halo Infinites as soon as possible! That is all that matters...even though Halo 5 kinda sucked. Even though Halo 4 was so so. Even though Halo: ODST was not considered all that great. It doesn't matter. Halo is teh bomb! It is always teh bestest in every regard! So bring it on. Hold back next gen graphics to bring Halo Infinite on Xbox One...even though it looks far worse than Halo 5 graphically, and arguably worse than Killzone: Shadow Fall on PS4 (a 2013 game) lol.

Actually, this makes me laugh. Sorry, Halo fanboys, but this is just hilarious imo. And to add insult to injury, Killzone: Shadow Fall, a 2013 launch tile for PS4 looks better than Halo Infinite.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOmm3uaH1Rk

Yeah, Fable 1 was so fabulous...if you can deal with "try to get your combat multiplier even higher" voiceover on a regular basis. Fable 1 is annoying in that regard. Fable 2 is a little better imo, but it wasn't a vast improvement or anything. Fable 3 was just kind of there and was nothing exciting or new or innovative. It was just...there. I seriously doubt hardcore Xbox 360 and Xbox One lovers are DYING AND ARE SALIVATING over a new Fable title. Who cares really?

@princeofshapeir: There are a lot of gaming outlets who reviewed Sekiro. I'm sure there are several outlets that slapped a high rating on Sekiro before finishing the game. Yeah, maybe some outlets actually beat the game before review time. Nobody really knows for sure unless those outlets streamed the entire game, ending and all. This kind of stuff (review scores before finishing) most likely happens with many other games as well. Think Assassin's Creed Odyssey. While not gruelingly difficult and actually fairly easy, the game was massive and took a long time to beat, even with minimal sidequesting. Who really knows how many gaming outlets actually beat the game before tacking a final review score on it?

GameSpot has a tentative 9 outta 10 right now for Sekiro because Tamoor (even having the game many days in advance of the review) got maybe 2/3 through the game. It's obvious he's struggling to beat it. Who really can be sure that the gaming sites who released the earliest review scores of Sekiro on Metacritic actually beat the entire game? Ironically, of all gaming websites...for once I think IGN might have beaten the entire game before their 9.5 rating. The guy streaming beat the tutorial boss first try easily. One of the more skillful IGN gamers out there from what I've seen. He might have steamrolled through the entire game for all I know. His skill is much better than Tamoor lol.

"Skyrim is a very popular rpg. We have to put it at number 1 regardless whether we believe it or not. We need them them clicks son, even if the game is the most casualized Elder Scrolls"

lol the review on youtube has more downvotes because of teh 8 score, yet AngryCentaurGaming (who basically says the exact same thing about the game in terms of single and multiplayer) has tons more upvotes. Ok then.

Wii U is an epic flop and is on track to sell even worse than Gamecube. How could anyone think it won't be last place?

i smell a 6.0

Why is NIntendo worried? They have Wayne Brady! The presence of this man alone will turn Wii U around into the megaton of all megatons. This will go down in history as Nintendo's greatest decision ever.