@SteveN @M4cR1II3n Yeah, I have one with the games I own and when with the ones I'm playing. However, the stack for played games is completely empty, meaning I would have add over 900 games manually through that one.
On top of that, these stacks do not show the scores for the games in an easily accessible manner like the old site, only their name and image in a seemingly random order.
Oh, and why were the half.scores removed? We used to be able to rate games in decimals before, now we can't even rate them in halves?
One of the best episodes so far! Loved the comment on Johnny being "biased on his own opinion", classic! Having played both games myself, I can definitely see why this game got the score it got; Riptide was especially disappointing in that it fixed so very little of the many issues the first game had. "But it's not a REAL sequel, so they don't need to fix it!" my ass...
Underperformed? 3,4 million copies shipped in less than a month is under performing? Maybe they should have set the bar slightly lower, I seriously doubt they are actually losing money as much as they are not getting quite as high a profit as they hoped...
@netnerd85 @M4cR1II3n Not high at all, and I actually agree with you in most of these regards. The story, AI and stealth is better than the first game yes, but they are still awful compared to what they could/should have been.
The problem with S:GW2 is that while these things were improved, everything else was made worse. There is absolutely no freedom in this game whatsoever, it's more "Simon Says" than a game. That's why I prefer the first game, because that actually required some input from the player at least.
@Kevin-V @M4cR1II3n That would sort of make sense... (says the Swede who doesn't know a single Canadian). I usually agree with your review scores Kevin, which is why I was so shocked at hearing your voice giving this a 7.0.
@devastator1991 @mddma Cry Engine 3 does not equal great graphics (as is the case here). This game has awful character models, animations and textures throughout (though the Tibet levels are decent). And yes, I played it on highest settings on the PC. Crysis 3 looks at least twice as good on its lowest settings.
What the...? Was Kevin high when he played this? This is nowhere near a 7! The AI is terrible (you can clearly see this in the review even) and the story ridiculous, and you don't care for the characters at all. I can't even remember the name of the guy you were playing!
Not to mention the linearity of the gameplay where your spotter will call out every single target you need to kill or the fact that the space you get to manoeuvre on is about the same as Doom 3. Really, the first game was a lot better, broken stealth and all. At least you got to play that game the way you wanted!
M4cR1II3n's comments