Is that based on your expertise in enforcing the law, and in addition, the expertise in litigation involving criminal matters involving state and federal laws?
No, my expertise is in consumer law. In the distant past I've studied/had training on civil procedure, rules of evidence law, cross examinations for criminal cases, etc., but I ultimately decided to keep criminal law as a hobby rather than a profession.
Anyway, none of that really matters. A child with a basic understanding of how courts work can see that Trump is breaking the rules and ignoring direct instructions from the judge. It's a pretty basic idea that both sides should make the best arguments they can, and shouldn't try to intimidate witnesses or undermine the authority of the judge.
Any adult with critical thinking skills should be able to discern why, for example, Trump keeps pretending that he wants to testify but makes up excuses for not doing so. Or why Trump's statements to the media are so different to his statements in court.
And then anyone with a background in law enforcement should immediately be able to see right through Trump, because they deal with people like him every day.
In what respect? And I can definitely tell it's a hobby with closely monitoring all things Trump from on your participation in this thread.
I'm not quite sure a child is an applicable parallel here, especially since children have difficulty understanding decorum in classrooms... must less a courtroom, but I appreciate the chuckle when it comes to hyperbolic silliness. My almost 3-year-old is still trying to learn the decorum of dinnertime... albeit that's a losing battle for a while.
Trump's persona speaks for itself and is entirely ego driven which clearly can't unmask itself with impunity in a courtroom.
I definitely do not deal with folks like Trump every day (thankfully). I investigate, interview and arrest those who prey on prepubescent and pubescent children.
Log in to comment