BlueArchan's comments

Avatar image for bluearchan
BlueArchan

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

@ronvalencia: @ronvalencia: wow!! Its reslly sad as well as interesting to see how you value human lives especially lives of innocent people. Probably you copied that ideology from someone. Then again its really sad you dont have your own look out at this.

You have no respect for others in that you are deciding yourself who is terrorized and who is not and who is at total war and who is not.

I heard muslims have this rule not to kill civiliances especially old ones women and childeren and anyone who has either surrendered or isnt fighting at all its written in their book. You on the other hand are preaching people to kill any one insight when its a total war situation. Kind a like terrorists do no? "kill anyone". Thats extreme.

Avatar image for bluearchan
BlueArchan

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

@ronvalencia: the most irresponsible statement of the millenia. Such an ideology is bullshit. Who told you that?

Avatar image for bluearchan
BlueArchan

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

@ronvalencia: in that case why do you people call talibans terrorist? Or any one at all for that matter?

Avatar image for bluearchan
BlueArchan

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

@ronvalencia: The Japanese commanding general, Tomoyuki Yamashita, and his chief of staff Akira Mutō, were held responsible for the massacre and other war crimes in a trial starting October 1945. So according to you or your wikipedia these were the responsible persons and USA killed 200,000+ people for revenge? You cant take revenge on innocent people who had nothing to do with anything. Thats terrorism, no?

Avatar image for bluearchan
BlueArchan

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

Edited By BlueArchan

@ronvalencia: so whats your point?

Avatar image for bluearchan
BlueArchan

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

@ronvalencia: revenge? Incorrect.

And revenge is legitimate? Specifcally Revenge with people who were innocents

Avatar image for bluearchan
BlueArchan

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

@ronvalencia: Bullshit? Thats the first i ever heard. You just said your self they have chosen as "suppliers" you didnt debunk the fact that huawei isnt first ever wirh 5G tech. They chose others as their supplier merely because of trumps restrictions that resulted in ban on huawei contracts but this doesnt change the fact that huawei is the first ever to comeup with 5G tech

Avatar image for bluearchan
BlueArchan

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

@ronvalencia: you can take the effort to write up the crux of these links perhaps?

Avatar image for bluearchan
BlueArchan

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

Edited By BlueArchan

@ronvalencia: and this backdoor never existed when trump alleged huawei to be a chinese spy company? This is a joke, the discovery of the backdoor was microsofts doing way after the trumps allegations, on what grounds did trump claim that huawei is a threat? Speculation? The same basis it used to bomb heroshima and nagasaki?

Also computer systems and softwares do have loopholes, the very reason even iphone have been hacked and like facebook and google have also been hacked in the past. Calling such loopholes as "backdoor" isnt a technical IT term but an emotional or mischevious term trump came up with to defame huawei and to change user opinions in an attenpt to cut it off from trade and/or damage reputation.