@henrythefifth: Then would you start by telling them to stop presenting theories? which is after all an important part of and incidental to the process of finding facts?

Further, believing is an important part of life. Believe causes suspicions which makes you skeptic and thus leads you towards facts.

@pimphand_gamer: Your experience does the job of teaching you, but what if you can get these teachings prior to going through so much? which would you priorities first? Thats the very reason we go to schools. To get the knowledge that already exists instead of creating it ourselves and waste time.

Experience has its own worth not negating it. It does the job better no doubt nobody wants to suffer uselessly.

@br0kenrabbit: What i think is the universe is infinite in that it could possibly be repeating the process of big bang and cosmic crunch. Possibly there might be other universe which could as well be repeating the same process in their own time. This relates to time and size both. The question is which came first the egg or the chicken? There has to be a start. Once agreed the next question is who started the start? a never ending question right? What can possibly be the answer, not asking to fill the gap with the word God but what could be the logical reasoning and assumptions that should be made to atleast develope a guiding point for humans.

Very good thing u asked. It can open up a new debate. It has to do with attributes i think. If i were to believe in God i would first set my own determining attributes for him. Physical forms that exist in historical books doesnt digest.

@br0kenrabbit: ok i am thankful. my question was how can you possibly apply the concept of infinity to the universe. but thats a secondary thing. the main question to this debate should be something that is truly leading towards a definite knowledge/concept/pathway/trail other wise i get it this is going to lead us no where except for the confusing abstracts of thoughtfulness if it makes sense.

@br0kenrabbit: and you are such a slave of wikipedia whos thoughtfulness is so dependent on it?

You are now making sets of infinity lol. How can u actually quantify that this is one set and that is another and this comes after this?

Then what is infinity? The unknown or a fact?

Last time i checked there were seven 7,articles about fortnite on the home page. Marketing is one thing but just dont bombard us with materials about one specific game. There are other users out there waiting for some other usefull articles. Like after Resident evil 2 remake they could have wrote something about reviving old games and what do people expect. I know its in the forums but an article from a pro is better. And if its there then there are just tons of ther stuff they can write about.

I disagree. Each of the first five news items are all about fortnite. I have been noticing this since a couole of weeks. Thats not how you maintain your worth as a gaming website to be honest. I strongly recommend to change this method. Its biased partial and focused not free or dynamic.

So you dont even realise how important this infinity is?

I haven't played fortnite so i cant say if its good or bad. But what irritates me is that almost the whole home page is filled with fortnite news while leaving out the rest to last.

This is not justified so please change the methods.

A big thanks to who ever deals with that.