This topic is locked from further discussion.
Please let it be scoring...
Wii U Zelda 10 !!! :shock:
No, no, no, sheapskins, remember, the guy hasn't a clue dontchaknow and Wii :twisted: won't forget it. :P
I voted for Halo 3 because he already gave inFAMOUS 2 a 7.5 and Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword a 7.5 so I think since a Sony exclusive flopped and a Nintendo exclusive flopped so why not a Microsoft exclusive.
none, but it's a waste of time hoping people realizes that he is a bad reviewer instead haters like him cause he fails at reviewing some titles they hate
[QUOTE="Thefatness16"]
Halo 4. It would be pretty entertaining to see the aftermath fo a fop of that magnitude.
Demonjoe93
It would be awful. The first page would be nothing but Halo 4 hate threads. :lol:
Nothing, and I mean nothing will beat 7.5.But him reviewing Halo 4 would be epic. :P
I just had a thought. How cool would it be if their PC players on Gamespot reviewed only the PC version and the console guys only reviewed the console versions? Tom McShea is a console guy right? They should have him do the console version and Kevin VanOrd do the PC review for a multiplat game. That would really interest me. And they had to keep their scores seperate, no trading info.DragonfireXZ95
it all comes down to contstraints and staffing at the end of the day.
Why would anybody want him to review anything? He's completely inconsistant and unpredictable. You'll never know what he'll be okay with in one game but bash in another...
Well, in the end its just going to be an opinion.... I don't see the big deal.[QUOTE="Just-Breathe"][QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"] Lord, please no!sonic1564
His skyward sword got an honest 7.5 score and made a lot of sheep angry. Its like me giving Twilight .5 out of 5 stars and making Twilight fanboys (hell f*** it, fangirls) angry. I gave Harry Potter a 5 out of 5 due to my biased towards the books.
Please enlighten me on the criteria for an "honest" review.
Diablo 3We all know that the king of all reviewers is Tom McShea (I call him God McPerfect). The main question is what game will he give an honest review of. What do you want him to review?
sonic1564
Is he hated because he gave Zelda: skyward suck it up a bad review?LustForSoul
Nice try, he became famous with his review of Infamous 2 actually.
Um.....Who is this Tom McShea?AmazonTreeBoaReading this thread more, I am under the impression he is a reviewer for this site. That would explain why I have no clue who he is. I never used GS reviews.
[QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"]Um.....Who is this Tom McShea?AmazonTreeBoaReading this thread more, I am under the impression he is a reviewer for this site. That would explain why I have no clue who he is. I never used GS reviews. You are a fantastic human being! That you make up your own mind about games is just WOW :shock:! I wish I was confident like that.
[QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"][QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"]Um.....Who is this Tom McShea?SushigluttonReading this thread more, I am under the impression he is a reviewer for this site. That would explain why I have no clue who he is. I never used GS reviews. You are a fantastic human being! That you make up your own mind about games is just WOW :shock:! I wish I was confident like that. Na, I use reviews to help me decide which games to and not to get. I just don't use GS reviews. Outside of the forums, this site is useless to me. I don't read news, previews, or review from this site. I only use the forums.
GTA V. But stay away from Ps3 exclusives Mr Godperfect! The Last of Us should be reviewed by the apple cheeked guy who host the gun show!SushigluttonTotally agree.... leave PS3 exclusive alone
I think McShea should only review all the big games, that way everyone get's pissed off lol. I thought his Zelda SS review was crap, especially what he said about controls, so I think he is pretty unprofessional. However I don't care because reivews are just opinions and the only one that matters is your own, plus the problem is also with people here and the score system it'self.
Anything that scores below a 9 on here is considered a flop (no I don't care about SW stupid definition, no one does) and they deem it an instant failure. Killzone 3 got an 8.5, and people read that as being like a 1.5 instead lol. This is the 1-10 score is skewed, it should be 1-5 with NO half points because it would make more sense, plus people wouldn't be stupid about it and thinking that a 4 would be bad.
That is the review scale that I personally prefer and I think it's the most accurate and fair, I mean what is the difference between an 8.5 and a 9? Really that is such a small difference just round it up then. And no game is perfect so the 10 should never get thrown out then, those games always end up scoring 9.5. A 1-5 scoring system is better, and who cares about a game scoring AAA or AA or whatever, that doesn't matter. It doesn't determine wethe or not YOU like the game, so what's the point? Make your own review, because your's is the only one that matters.
You don't really get the game we play with scores,do you?I think McShea should only review all the big games, that way everyone get's pissed off lol. I thought his Zelda SS review was crap, especially what he said about controls, so I think he is pretty unprofessional. However I don't care because reivews are just opinions and the only one that matters is your own, plus the problem is also with people here and the score system it'self.
Anything that scores below a 9 on here is considered a flop (no I don't care about SW stupid definition, no one does) and they deem it an instant failure. Killzone 3 got an 8.5, and people read that as being like a 1.5 instead lol. This is the 1-10 score is skewed, it should be 1-5 with NO half points because it would make more sense, plus people wouldn't be stupid about it and thinking that a 4 would be bad.
That is the review scale that I personally prefer and I think it's the most accurate and fair, I mean what is the difference between an 8.5 and a 9? Really that is such a small difference just round it up then. And no game is perfect so the 10 should never get thrown out then, those games always end up scoring 9.5. A 1-5 scoring system is better, and who cares about a game scoring AAA or AA or whatever, that doesn't matter. It doesn't determine wethe or not YOU like the game, so what's the point? Make your own review, because your's is the only one that matters.
ShadowMoses900
[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]You don't really get the game we play with scores,do you?I think McShea should only review all the big games, that way everyone get's pissed off lol. I thought his Zelda SS review was crap, especially what he said about controls, so I think he is pretty unprofessional. However I don't care because reivews are just opinions and the only one that matters is your own, plus the problem is also with people here and the score system it'self.
Anything that scores below a 9 on here is considered a flop (no I don't care about SW stupid definition, no one does) and they deem it an instant failure. Killzone 3 got an 8.5, and people read that as being like a 1.5 instead lol. This is the 1-10 score is skewed, it should be 1-5 with NO half points because it would make more sense, plus people wouldn't be stupid about it and thinking that a 4 would be bad.
That is the review scale that I personally prefer and I think it's the most accurate and fair, I mean what is the difference between an 8.5 and a 9? Really that is such a small difference just round it up then. And no game is perfect so the 10 should never get thrown out then, those games always end up scoring 9.5. A 1-5 scoring system is better, and who cares about a game scoring AAA or AA or whatever, that doesn't matter. It doesn't determine wethe or not YOU like the game, so what's the point? Make your own review, because your's is the only one that matters.
freedomfreak
No I understand it, it's just stupid. Sorry I'm not "nerd" enough to care about an internet game like you. In real life the term "flop" means bad or fail, and that's I use, real life terms. No one cares about your stupid SW definition or internet games.
No I understand it, it's just stupid. Sorry I'm not "nerd" enough to care about an internet game like you. In real life the term "flop" means bad or fail, and that's I use, real life terms. No one cares about your stupid SW definition or internet games.
ShadowMoses900
[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]You don't really get the game we play with scores,do you?Considering these review scores effect the developers I do not find them "fun".I think McShea should only review all the big games, that way everyone get's pissed off lol. I thought his Zelda SS review was crap, especially what he said about controls, so I think he is pretty unprofessional. However I don't care because reivews are just opinions and the only one that matters is your own, plus the problem is also with people here and the score system it'self.
Anything that scores below a 9 on here is considered a flop (no I don't care about SW stupid definition, no one does) and they deem it an instant failure. Killzone 3 got an 8.5, and people read that as being like a 1.5 instead lol. This is the 1-10 score is skewed, it should be 1-5 with NO half points because it would make more sense, plus people wouldn't be stupid about it and thinking that a 4 would be bad.
That is the review scale that I personally prefer and I think it's the most accurate and fair, I mean what is the difference between an 8.5 and a 9? Really that is such a small difference just round it up then. And no game is perfect so the 10 should never get thrown out then, those games always end up scoring 9.5. A 1-5 scoring system is better, and who cares about a game scoring AAA or AA or whatever, that doesn't matter. It doesn't determine wethe or not YOU like the game, so what's the point? Make your own review, because your's is the only one that matters.
freedomfreak
Considering these review scores effect the developers I do not find them "fun".
fueled-system
[QUOTE="fueled-system"]
Considering these review scores effect the developers I do not find them "fun".
freedomfreak
[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]
[QUOTE="fueled-system"]
Considering these review scores effect the developers I do not find them "fun".
fueled-system
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment