This article is saying nothing. Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo are doing different things completely. Even in that article he says that Sony allows for complete save files to be clouded. So in what way is Sony not poised to capitalize on the future? They also are coming out with handheld phones and have a foothold in the mobile console. I don't understand.

It's like trying to compare the Wii-mote, Kinect, and Move. They're different systems designed for different things. The Wii-mote is designed for the complete casual gamer and child. The Kinect is made for-- well idiots who don't like any semblance or real game control. And the Move is designed for Hardcore gamers as evidenced by games like KZ3 and the upcoming SOCOM.

Move makes games better and so does Sony 3D imho

Snyper-007

Agreed. 3d makes it cooler, but the Move gameplay enhances the experience more than 3D.

Move Heroes and Sorcery are built from the ground up for Move, and they are right around the corner. There is a demo for Move Heroes on psn, and it is fun.

Killzone 3 is very enjoyable with Move. Once you get use to it, you dont want to go back to dual shock.

Videodogg

Totally agree. I definitely don't want to go back to the Dual Shock.

I didn't even know you could use the Move with Tron. Where can you use it in the game?

I posted something like this earlier in another thread, but I thought it'd spark an interesting conversation. Something that's really held back RTS' on consoles is the controller, it's just not designed for RTS'. Kinect and Move on the other hand would be perfect for RTS', you could simply point to select a unit (some sort of mouse or small dot could be on the screen when it detects you poitning forward, and there'd be hand movements for selecting a unit or multiple units) and then select a spot on the map to send the units, or maybe make them attack, etc. and you can easily move between armies (groups of select units) by swiping your hand to the right or left. This allows you to really feel "in control" and would be kind of fun to do. It'd really be "thinking on your feet" so what do you all think? Would this really work well with RTS'? Or am I just crazy? May the discussing, begin!

XVision84

I think you make a good point. Even tough they're is a lot more that pointing and clicking, the Move would help in quickly moving troops around in an effective manner. I'd definitely use the Move for that.

I'll be happy as long as future FPS's have Move functionality.

One thing that Killzone 3 has over halo and Cod ( besides graphics) is the new brutal melee kills. They are way cooler than the melee kills in halo reach and the beat the heck out of call of duty simple knife slash. It's so much more satisfying in killzone 3 getting behind someone and slit their throat or jamming a knife in someones eye or breaking their necks. Just pure awesomeness!! Anyone else agree/ disagree? ShadowNinja87

It also does awesome Move/Sharpshooter functionality instead of crappy Kinect functionality or no motion functionality at all.

[QUOTE="JohnF111"]Mouse owns controller but keyboard is terrible for gaming... admit it hermits, it aint comfortable using clunky square keys with your hand spanned across the board with doctors everywhere stressing about Carpal Tunnel Syndrome from how keyboards are badly designed and exaggerated by gaming. I enjoy gaming on my PC but i can clearly see a problem with keyboards and if you don't see it then you're just used to it and nothing else.Mr_BillGates

That WOULD be awesome. Can you play games like that?

Yes. It's an awesome deal. Buying each individually is $220, so you're saving $70.

@Gamerfan Taking forward what are the good FPS games in ps3? i figured out a few like 1>killzone 3 2>SOCOM4 3>Time Crisis 4 4>The Shoot. But apart from thing are there any FPS? Regards & Thanks Runie ANDHAR_RUNIE

Dead Space: Extraction also. I heard you can use the Sharpshooter with MAG too. I'm pretty sure that most FPS games coming out will have Move Support from now on too because the functionality is so different and more immersive.